02 | Administrative Law | MCQ for LLB, LLM, Advocate and All Judicial Se...
What is Arrest, can a private person make an arrest, what procedure is p...
The
word "Arrest" when used in its ordinary sense means the restraint or
the deprivation of one's personal liberty to go where he pleases. When used in
the legal sense, an arrest consists of taking a person into custody under the
authority empowered by law for the purpose of holding or detaining him to
answer a criminal charge and preventing the commission of criminal
offence. Section 46 of Criminal Procedure Code provides as to
how arrest is to be made.
Section
46 says that in making an arrest the police
officer or other person making the same shall actually touch and confine the
body of the person to be arrested unless there be a submission to the custody
by words or action.
In Rahimal
v. State of U.P. 1992 Criminal Law Journal 3819, it was observed
that Section 46 does not contemplate any formality before a person can be said
to be taken in custody. Submission to custody by words or action is sufficient.
But investigating officer should give full details as to in what manner the
accused was arrested. Single sentence of I.O. regarding arrest without
mentioning even the time and place is not sufficient to prove arrest.
ARREST
BY PRIVATE PERSON Section 43 of
Cr.P.C. provide that any private person may arrest or cause to be arrested any
person:
(a) Who in his
presence commits a non-bailable and cognizable offence.
(b) Who is a
proclaimed offender.
Such
private person after the arrest, without unnecessary delay shall make over or
cause to be made over the person arrested to police officer or take him to
nearest police station.
Sub-section
(2) to Section 43 then provides that if the person so arrested
appears to come under the provisions of Section 41 of Code,
such police officer shall rearrest him. Section 43(3) says if the
police officer has reason to believe that the person arrested has committed a
non-cognizable offence provisions of Section 42 would apply if
such arrested person refuses to give his name and address or gives a false name
and address.
In Abdul
Habib v. State 1974 Criminal Law Journal 248, it was held that a
private person can not arrest any one on mere suspicion or information. The
offence must be committed in his view or in his presence. Where therefore an
individual seeing a person fleeing with the knife in his hand pursued by
others, tries to arrest him his exercise of power of arrest cannot be brought
under Section 43.
In Directorate
of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan AIR 1994 SC 1775, it was observed
"The code gives power of arrest not only to a Police Officer and a
Magistrate but also under certain circumstances or given situations to private
persons. Further, when an accused person appears before a Magistrate or
surrenders voluntarily, the Magistrate is empowered to take that accused person
into custody and deal with him according to law. Needless to emphasize that the
arrest of a person is a condition precedent for taking him into judicial
custody thereof. To put it differently, the taking of the person into judicial
custody is followed after the arrest of the person concerned by the Magistrate
on appearance or surrender. In every arrest, there is custody but not
vice-versa and that both the words `custody' and `arrest' are not synonymous
terms."
The provision relating to Public Prosecutor, under the Code of Criminal
Section
2(4) of Code says "Public Prosecutor" means any person appointed
under section 24 and includes any person acting under the directions of Public
Prosecutor.
Since
in criminal cases State is in the prosecutor, the State is represented in the
Court by the Public Prosecutor. In the High Courts and Court of Sessions the
State Government is represented by Public Prosecutor and in the Court of
Magistrate by the Assistant Public Prosecutor.
The
provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the appointment of Public
Prosecutors are contained in Section 24, which provides as herein under :-
(1)
For every High Court, the Central Government, or the State Government shall,
after consultation with the High Court, appoint a Public Prosecutor and may
also appoint one or more Additional Public Prosecutors, for conducting in such
Court, any prosecution, appeal or other proceeding on behalf of the Central
Government or State Government, as the case may be.
(2)
The Central Government may appoint one or more Public Prosecutors, for the
purpose of conducting any case or class of cases in any district or local area.
(3)
For every district, the State Government shall appoint a Public Prosecutor and
may also appoint one or more Additional Public Prosecutors for the district :
Provided that the
Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor appointed for one district
may be appointed also to be a Public Prosecutor or an Additional Public
Prosecutor, as the case may be, for another district.
(4)
The District Magistrate shall, in consultation with the Sessions Judge, prepare
a panel of names of persons, who are in his opinion fit to be appointed as
Public Prosecutors or Additional Public Prosecutors for the district.
(5)
No person shall be appointed by the State Government as the Public Prosecutor
or Addl. Public Prosecutor for the district unless his name appears in the
panel of names prepared by the District Magistrate under sub-section (4).
(6)
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5) where in a State there
exists a regular Cadre of Prosecuting Officers, the State Government shall
appoint a Public Prosecutor or an Addl. Public Prosecutor only from among the
persons constituting such Cadre :
Provided that
where, in the opinion of the State Government, no suitable person is available
in such Cadre for such appointment, the Government may appoint a person as
Public Prosecutor or Addl. Public Prosecutor, as the case may be from the
panels of names prepared under sub- section (4).
(7)
A person shall be eligible to be appointed as a Public Prosecutor or an Addl.
Public Prosecutor under sub-section (1), (2) or (3) or (6), only if he is in
practice as an advocate for not less than 7 years.
(8)
The Central Government or the State Government may appoint for the purpose of
any case or class of cases, a person who has been in practice for not less than
ten years, as a Special Public Prosecutor.
(9)
For the purpose of sub-sections (7) and (8), the period during which a person
has been in practice as a pleader, or has rendered (whether before or after
commencement of this Code) service as a Public Prosecutor or as an Addl. Public
Prosecutor or as Assistant Public Prosecutor or other Prosecution Officer, by
whatever name called, shall be deemed to be the period during which such person
has been in practice as an advocate.
In State
of Rajasthan v. Manohar 1981(2) SCC 525, it was held that notification
by State Government appointing Advocate General is to be public prosecutor
under section 24 Criminal P.C. - Another Notification by Advocate General
authorising law officers including Deputy Advocate General to act, plead and
argue in all matters covered by code - Held - Deputy Advocate General was
public servant.
In R.
Sarala v. T.S. Velu and others AIR 2000 SC 1731, it was observed that
role of Public Prosecutor is inside the court and it commences after
investigating agency presents the case in court after completion of
investigation. Therefore, involving Public Prosecutor in investigation is
injudicious and an investigating officer can not be directed to consult the
Public Prosecutor before filling his report under section 173 Cr. P.C.
According
to section 25 an Assistant Public Prosecutor is appointed to conduct
prosecutions in the Courts of Magistrates. They are appointed by the State
Government. No police officer is eligible for appointment as such but in a case
for which no Assistant Public Prosecutor is available, the District Magistrate
may appoint any other person to be Assistant may also be so appointed but such
police officer should not be below the rank of an Inspector or and he should
not have participated in the investigation of the case being prosecuted. A new
sub-section (1-A) to Section 25 of the Code has been inserted by the Amendment
Act, 1978, by which Central Government may also appoint Assistant Public
Prosecutors for conducting cases in the Court of Magistrate.
In S.B.
Shane v. State AIR 1995 SC 1628, it was observed that according to
section 25 there is statutory obligation imposed on the state or Central
Government to appoint one or more Asst. Public Prosecutors in every district
for conducting prosecutions in the Magistrate Courts and of making such Assit.
Public Prosecutors independent of the Police Department by constituting
separate cadre of such Asst. Public Prosecutor and creating a separate
Prosecution Department and its Head directly responsible to Govt. for such
Department's work.
The various classes of Criminal courts and their powers
Chapter
II of Code and Sections 6 to 24 deal with the constitution of Criminal Courts.
Section 6 of Code says -
Besides
the High Courts and the Courts constituted under any law, other than this Code,
there shall be, in every State, the following classes of Criminal Courts,
namely :-
(i) Courts of
Session;
(ii) Judicial
Magistrates of the first class and, in any metropolitan area, Metropolitan
Magistrates;
(iii) Judicial
Magistrates of the second class; and
(iv) Executive
Magistrates.
Then
Section 7 of the Code says that every State shall consist of Session division
and each Session division, for the purpose of this Code, shall be district or
consist of districts. In substance provision under section 7 is the same as was
provided in old code but as a result of separation of judicial functions of
magistrate from those of executive consequential changes were brought. Then
Section 8 of code says that State Government may by notification declare any
area in the State, comprising a city or town whose population exceeds one
million shall be metropolitan area and city of Ahmedabad declared to be
metropolitan area. State Government have also been empowered to extend, reduce
or alter the limits of metropolitan area.
Section
9 of Code says -
(1) The State
Government shall establish a Court of Session for every sessions division.
(2) Every court of
Session shall be presided over by a Judge, to be appointed by the High Court.
(3) The High Court
may also appoint Additional Sessions Judges and Assistant Sessions Judges to
exercise jurisdiction in a Court of Session.
(4) The Sessions
Judge of one Sessions division may be appointed by the High Court to be also an
Additional Sessions Judge of another division, and in such case he may sit for
the disposal of cases at such place or places in the other division as the High
Court may direct.
(5) Where the
office of the Sessions Judge is vacant, the High Court may make arrangements
for the disposal of any urgent application which is, or may be, made or pending
before such Court of Session by an Additional or Assistant Sessions Judge, or,
if there be no Additional or Assistant Sessions Judge, by a Chief Judicial
Magistrate, in the sessions division; and every such Judge or Magistrate shall
have jurisdiction to deal with any such application.
(6) The Court of
Session shall ordinarily hold its sitting at such place or places as the High
Court may, by notification, specify; but, if, in any particular case, the Court
of Session is of opinion that it will tend to the general convenience of the
parties and witness to hold its sittings at any other place in the sessions
division, it may, with the consent of the prosecution and the accused, sit at
that place for the disposal of the cases or the examination of any witness or
witnesses therein.
So
Section 9 deals with the power of State Government to establish Courts of
Sessions and the power of High Court to appoint judges thereto and to direct at
what places such courts shall hold its sittings. The State Government is bound
to establish a Court of Session for every Sessions division then section 10
declares that all Assistant Sessions Judges shall be subordinate to Sessions
Judge, who will time to time make rules as to distribution of business among
such Assistant Sessions Judges.
Then
Section 11 provides -
(1) In every
district (not being a metropolitan area), there shall be established as many
Courts of Judicial Magistrates of the first class and of the second class, and
at such places, as the State Government may, after consultation with the High
Court, by notification, specify:
Provided that the
State Government may, after consultation with the High Court, establish, for
any local area, one or more Special Courts of Judicial Magistrates of the first
class or of the second class to try any particular case or particular class of
cases, and where any such Special Court is established, no other court of
Magistrate in the local area shall have jurisdiction to try any case or class
of cases for the trial of which the such Special Court of Judicial Magistrate
has been established.
(2) The presiding
officers of such Courts shall be appointed by the High Court.
(3) The High Court
may, whenever, it appears to be expedient or necessary, confer the powers of a
Judicial Magistrate of the first class or of the second class on any member of
the Judicial Service of the State, functioning as a Judge in a Civil Court.
The
Section 12 says that in every district (not being a metropolitan area) High
Court shall appoint a Judicial Magistrate of first class to be Chief Judicial
Magistrate and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and Sub- divisional
Judicial Magistrate. Then Section 13 of Code says that High Court upon the
request of Central or State Government, confer upon any person who hold or has
held any post under the Government all or any powers conferrable under the code
to a Judicial Magistrate of first or second class for particular case or class
of cases provided such person possesses such qualification and experience in
legal affairs as High Court requires and such Magistrate shall be called
"Special Magistrate" who will be appointed for term not exceeding one
year at a time. Then section 14 of Code says subject to control of High Court,
Chief Judicial Magistrate may from time to time define local jurisdiction
within which Magistrates as appointed under section 11 or 13 may exercise any
power as conferred under this Code. Then Section 15 says every Chief Judicial
Magistrate shall be subordinate to Sessions Judge and every other Judicial
Magistrate, shall be subject to general control of Sessions Judge be
subordinate to Chief Judicial Magistrate who shall from title to time make
rules or make order as to distribution of business among Judicial Magistrates.
Thereafter
Sections 16, 17, 18 and 19 deal regarding Metropolitan Magistrate on similar
provisions as stated above. Then section 20 says that in every District and
Metropolitan area, the State Government may appoint any numbers of Executive
Magistrates and one of them shall be appointed as District Magistrate. State
Government may appoint an Executive Magistrate as Additional District
Magistrate and may place any such executive magistrate in sub-division who
shall be called `Sub-divisional Magistrate. Section 21 provides regarding
appointment of Special Executive Magistrate. Then Section 22 says that subject
to control of State Government, District Magistrate from time to time, may
define local limits of jurisdiction of Executive Magistrates. All Executive Magistrates,
other than Additional District Magistrate shall be subordinate to District
Magistrate who will make rules regarding distribution of work among Executive
Magistrate. (Section 23).
Power
of Courts :- Chapter III of Codes deal with power of
different criminal courts. Section 26 deals with the description of offences
cognizable by several courts constituted under the Code. Section 26(a) says any
offence of I.P.C. may be tried by
(i) High Court or
(ii) Court of
Session or
(iii) any Judicial
Magistrate by which such offence is shown in First Schedule, to be triable.
Section
26(b) says any offence under any other law shall be tried by court as mentioned
in that law and when no such court is so mentioned, then it will be tried by
(i) High Court or
(ii) Court by
which such offence is shown in First Schedule to triable.
Section
27 of Code then says about jurisdiction of court in case of Juveniles.
Then
Section 28 says -
"(1) A High
Court may pass any sentence authorised by law.
(2) A Sessions
Judge or Additional Sessions Judge may pass any sentence authorised by law; but
any sentence of death passed by such Judge shall be subject to confirmation by
the High Court.
(3) Any Assistant
Sessions Judge may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death
or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding ten
years."
Section
29 of Code says -
"(1) The
Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law
except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a
term exceeding seven years.
(2) The Court of a
Magistrate of the first class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term
not exceeding three years, or of fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or of
both.
(3) The Court of a
Magistrate of the second class may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term
not exceeding one year, or of fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, or of
both.
(4) The Court of a
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall have the powers of the Court of a Chief Judicial
Magistrate and that of a Metropolitan Magistrate, the powers of the Court of a
Magistrate of the first class."
Then
Section 30 says -
(1) The Court of a
Magistrate may award such term of imprisonment in default of payment of fine as
is authorised by law :
Provided that the
term -
(a) is not in
excess of the powers of the Magistrate under Section 29;
(b) shall not,
where imprisonment has been awarded as part of the substantive sentence, exceed
one-fourth of the term of imprisonment which the Magistrate is competent to
inflict as punishment for the offence otherwise than as imprisonment in default
of payment of the fine.
(2) The
imprisonment awarded under this section may be in addition to a substantive
sentence of imprisonment for the maximum term awardable by the Magistrate under
Section 29.
Difference between Investigation, Inquiry and Trial
Section
2(g) of Code of Criminal Procedure defines the
term : "Inquiry" "Inquiry means every inquiry other
than a trial conducted under this code by a Magistrate or Court."
Term
"Inquiry" is wider than `b'. In V.C. Shukla v.
State through C.B.I. AIR 1980 SC 962. The Supreme Court has held
that from the time the accused appears or is produced before the Magistrate
with the Police Report under Section 170 of Code and the
Magistrate proceeds to enquire whether Section 207 of Code has
been complied with and then proceeds to commit the accused to the court of
Session, the proceedings before the Magistrate would be an inquiry as
contemplated by Section 2(g) of the Code."
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9tkDP4CrfefciWJN0y
So
"Inquiry" is a name given to a proceeding conducted under the Code of
Criminal Procedure by a Magistrate or a Court, other than a trial for
ascertaining or verifying facts with a view to take some action under the code.
Ambit of Inquiry is very wide and comprehensive and include proceedings under Sections
340, 144, 145, 176, 446 of Cr.P.C.
Section
2(h) of Code define the expression
"Investigation" as "Investigation includes all the proceedings
under this code for the collection of evidence, conducted by Police Officer or
by any person (other than Magistrate) who is authorized by a Magistrate in this
behalf."
Supreme
Court recently in Navin Chandra N. Majithia v. State of Meghalaya
2000(4) Recent Criminal Reports 476 has observed "The Code
contemplates the following steps to be carried out during such investigation
(1) Proceeding to spot (2) Ascertainment of the facts and circumstances of the
case (3) Discovery and arrest of suspected offender (4) Collection of evidence
relating to the commission of offence which may consist of (a) the examination
of various persons (including accused) and reduction of their statement into
writing (b) search of places, seizure of things considered necessary for
investigation and to be produced at the trial. (5) Formation of opinion
as to whether on material collected, there is a case to place the accused
before Magistrate for trial and if so taking the necessary steps for the same
by the filing of a charge sheet under Section 173."
DISTINCTION
BETWEEN INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION : An
`Inquiry' relates to a proceeding held by a court or Magistrate while an
`Investigation' relates to steps taken by a police officer or a person other
than a Magistrate. The object of Inquiry is to determine `prima facie' the
truth of falsity of certain facts in order to take further action thereon.
Object of Investigation to ascertain the facts and collecting the evidence
relating to commission of crime and to arrest the offender.
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9tkDP4CrfefciWJN0y
Term
"Trial" has not been defined in the Code. Trial may be said to be a
judicial proceeding which ends either in conviction or acquittal of the
accused. If in a proceeding the court has no power to convict or acquit, it is
no `trial'. Trial includes all steps which a criminal court adopts subsequent
to the framing of charge and until the pronouncement of judgement.
INQUIRY
AND TRIAL - DISTINCTION : Inquiry is the second
stage of a criminal proceeding and is always to be conducted by a Magistrate.
Term `Trial' is distinguished as an original judicial proceeding. A judicial
proceeding in a criminal case which ends either in conviction or acquittal of
the accused, is a proceeding in which evidence is or may be legally taken on
oath. The proceedings in a summon case after the appearance of accused or in a
warrant case, after the charge is drawn are trials . In criminal matters, the
inquiry is something different from trial. `Inquiry stops when trial begins so
all proceedings before Magistrate, before framing the charge which do not
result in conviction or acquittal can be termed as `Inquiry'. Trial presupposes
the idea of an offence. But inquiry relates or matters which are not offences .
Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offences, Bailable and Non Bailable Offenc...
(i) Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offences.
(ii) Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences.
(iii) Summons Cases and Warrant Cases.
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9tkDP4CrfefciWJN0y
Cognizable
and Non-Cognizable Offence Section 2(c) of
Code define "Cognizable Offences and Cognizable Cases" as
cognizable offence means offences for which and cognizable case means cases in
which police officer may in accordance with first schedule of Criminal
Procedure Code or under any other law for the time being in force arrest
without warrant.
Then Section
2(l) of Code defines Non-Cognizable Offences and
Non-Cognizable Cases as non-cognizable offence means offences for
which and non-cognizable case means cases in which police officer has no
authority to arrest without warrant.
So
difference between cognizable and non-cognizable offences lies in the fact that
in case of cognizable offence, a police officer can arrest without warrant
whereas in Non-Cognizable offences police officer can not arrest any one
without warrant.
Column
4 of First Schedule attached to the Code of Criminal Procedure mentions which
are cognizable offences and which are non-cognizable offences. In case of
commission of cognizable offence, if matter is reported to police, then police
will record the First Information Report under Section 154 of
Code and shall proceed to investigate the matter and arrest the accused without
any warrant or Order of Magistrate. But in case of Non-Cognizable offence,
police can not investigate without Order of Magistrate. Section 155 of
Code provides procedure to be adopted by police in case of non-cognizable
offences
Bailable
and Non-Bailable Offences Section 2(a) of
Code of Criminal Procedure defines `Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences' Section
2(a) says "Bailable offence means an offence which is shown as
bailable in the first schedule or which is made bailable by any other law for
the time being in force and non-bailable offence means any other offence.
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9tkDP4CrfefciWJN0y
Column 5 of
first schedule in its first part mention which offence of Indian Penal Code is
bailable and which is non-bailable. Second part of the first schedule of Code
deals with offences, other than that of Indian Penal Code and provides that all
those offences which are punishable with imprisonment for term of 7 years
or more are non-bailable and all offences punishable with imprisonment for term
of three years or more are also non-bailable but offence punishment of which is
imprisonment for term less than three years are bailable.
Chapter
XXXIII of Code contains provisions regarding bail. Section 436 of
Code provides as to bail in bailable offences Bail in bailable offences is a
matter of right. Then Section 437 of Code provides as to
granting of bail by Magistrate in non-bailable offences . It also provides that
Magistrate shall not grant bail in offence punishable with death or
imprisonment for life. However in case of person less than 16 years
of age or woman or sick or infirm person, Magistrate may grant bail even in
case of offences punishable with imprisonment for life or with death.
Then Section 438 of Code provides for Anticipatory bail
and Section 439 of Code then provides for bail by Session
Court or High Court in non-bailable offences
SUMMON
AND WARRANT CASES Section 2(w) of
Code says `Summons case', means a case relating to an offence and not being
warrant case.
According
to Section 2(x) `Warrant case' means a case relating to an
offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for term
exceeding two years.
So
offences punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for
term exceeding 2 years are warrant cases and any other cases
are summons cases. Following are the points of difference between two:
(a) For trial of
Warrant Case by Magistrate two procedures are prescribed. One is adopted by
Magistrate in cases instituted on Police report (Sections 238 to
243 and 248 Cr.P.C.) and other is for case instituted otherwise than on police
report ( Sections 244 to 250 Cr.P.C.). Whereas, there is only
one procedure prescribed for trial of Summons Cases (Sections 251 to
259).
(b) Trial of
Warrant Cases as Summons Cases is an irregularity which vitiates the trial if prejudice
is caused to accused. But trial of Summons Cases as Warrant Cases is only
curable irregularity within the meaning of Section 465 of
Code.
(c) Where a
Warrant Case is tried as Summons Case and accused is acquitted, then Order of
acquittal will operate as discharge under Section 245 and
where a summon case is tried as a Warrant Case and accused is discharged
under Section 245, it will operate as Order of acquittal.
(d) In a Warrant
Case, framing of charge is necessary, whereas in Summon Cases framing of charge
against accused is not necessary.
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9tkDP4CrfefciWJN0y
Origin and developments of Law of Criminal Procedure
Ans. History
of Law of Procedure in Criminal Courts - Previous to 1882 there was no
uniform law of Criminal procedure for the whole of India. There were separate
Acts, mostly rudimentary in their character, to guide the procedure of numerous
courts in provinces and in the Presidency-towns. These Acts of procedure were
replaced by Act X of 1882 which was Code of Criminal Procedure 1882 (Act X)
which gave for the first time a uniform law of procedure for whole of India and
it was supplanted by a new Code in 1898.
The
Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 underwent drastic amendments at the hands of
legislature in 1923 and since 1923 changes were made from time to time by minor
Amendment Acts.
The
Code again underwent drastic amendments in 1955 by Code of Criminal Procedure
(Amendment) Act 26 of 1955. Schemes for the separation of judicial and
executive functions of Magistrate were introduced by State legislatures from
time to time and the Code was amended accordingly.
There
was a constant demand for the revision of the Code partly to simplify the
procedure and partly to introduce a uniform system in the country in relation
to Judicial and Executive functions of Magistrates. The Law Commission
therefore submitted a revised draft for the Code in its 13th report and
thereafter it had undergone some changes in the hands of the joint select
committee of the Parliament, and was passed into present form in 1973
Important
Changes to Act 2 of 1974 : Following changes were
brought about with a view to speeding up the disposal of Criminal Cases:-
(i) The
preliminary inquiry which precedes the trial by Court of Session, known as
"Committal proceedings" was abolished.
(ii) the scope of
summary trials was widened by including offences punishable with imprisonment
upto one year instead of six months.
(iii) the power of
revision against "interlocutory orders" was taken away.
(iv) the
provisions for compulsory stoppage of proceedings by subordinate court on mere
intimation from a party of his intention to move a higher court for transfer of
the case was omitted.
(v) Provision was
made for service of summons by registered post in certain cases.
(vi) Provisions
for legal aid to indigent persons were made.
(vii) Courts have
been empowered to order for payment of compensation by accused to victims of
crime
Scope
and Object of Code The object of the Criminal Procedure Code is
to provide a machinery for the punishment of offenders against the sub stantive
criminal law. It prescribes the procedure for the trial of offences which the
Indian Penal Code defines. Section 4 of this Code provides that all offences
under the Code shall be investigated, enquired into, tried and otherwise dealt
with according to the provisions of this Code. It also provides that offences
under a law other that the Indian Penal Code will also be tried according to
the provisions of the Procedure Code, but subject to any provision in that
other law in regard to investigation, inquiry or trial [Section 4(2)]. The Penal
Code is thus the substantive law, of which the Procedure Code furnishes the
adjective law to put in force its provisions. The Code is a code of procedure
and, like all procedural laws, is designed to further the ends of justice and
not to frustrate them by the introduction of endless technicalities. The object
of the Code is to ensure that an accused person gets a full and fair trial
along certain well-established and well-understood lines in accord with our
notions of natural justice.
In Wilie
Staney v. State of M.P., AIR 1956 SC 116, it was observed "The
object of code is to ensure that accused person gets full and fair trial along
certain well-established and well-understood lines that accord with our notions
of natural justice, under the code as in all procedural laws, certain things
are regarded as vital. Disregard of provisions of that nature is fatal to trial
and at once invalidates the conviction. Other are not vital and what ever the
irregularity, they can be cured. Chapter 45 of the code has carefully
classified certain kinds of errors and expressly indicates how they are to be
dealt with.
Historical Background of Administrative Law and reasons for its growth
Define and Explain - Administrative Law, Discuss its nature and scope
Administrative law is a branch of public law, which deals with the structure, powers and functions of the organs of administration; the limits of their powers and the methods, by which their powers are controlled, including the legal remedies available against them.
Prof. Jennings defines administrative law as the "law relating to administration. It determines the organization, powers and duties of administrative authorities".
H.L.A. Hart defines "Broadly conceived, administrative law includes law, that is made as well as the law, that controls the administrative authorities of the Government".
According to Wade, Administrative Law is `the law relating to the control of governmental power'. According to him, the primary object of Administrative Law is to keep powers of the Government within their legal bounds so as to protect the citizens against their abuse.
According to K.C. Davis , "Administrative Law is the law concerning the powers and procedures of administrative agencies, including especially the law governing judicial review of administrative action".
Garner also adopts the American approach advocated by K. C. Davis. According to him, Administrative Law may be described as "those rules which are recognised by the courts as law and which relate to and regulate the administration of Government".
Dicey has defined administrative law as, "It is that portion of a nation's legal system, which determines the legal status and liabilities of all State officials, and secondly, defines the rights and liabilities of private individuals in their dealings with public officials, and thirdly, specifies the procedure by which those rights and liabilities are enforced." This definition is narrow and restrictive in so far as it does not take into consideration many aspects of administrative law, such as public corporations etc.
His definition is mainly concerned with one aspect of administrative law, namely, judicial control of public officials.
So from above discussion it can be said that administrative law deals with structure, powers and functions of different administrative authorities and procedure to be followed by them in exercising powers and discharging duties so as to protect rights of any aggrieved person who has been affected by action of such authorities.Administrative Law deals with the organization and powers of administrative authorities. The emphasis on the organization is only to the extent that it is necessary to understand the powers, characteristics of action, procedure for the exercise of those powers and the control mechanism provided therein.In simple words, administrative law is the science of powers of administrative authorities.
(1) Legislative or Rule-making,
(2) Judicial or Adjudicative,
(3) Purely Executive.
Administrative Law deals with the powers of the administrative authorities, the manner in which the powers are exercised and the remedies, which are available to the aggrieved persons, when these authorities abuse those powers.
The key function of administrative law is to find the ways, in which the administration could be kept within limits, so that discretionary power may not become arbitrary powers. The task of Administrative Law is to reconcile, in the field of administrative action, democratic safeguard and standards of fair play with the effective conduct of Government.
As has been rightly observed by Lord Denning : "Properly exercised, the new powers of the executive lead to the Welfare State; but abused they lead to the Totalitarian State". The main object of the study of Administrative Law is to unravel the way in which these administrative authorities could be kept within their limits so that the discretionary powers may not be turned into arbitrary powers..
விபத்து நேரத்தில் ஓட்டுநர் குடிபோதையில் இருந்தாலும் காப்பீட்டு நிறுவனம் இழப்பீடு வழங்க கடமைப்பட்டுள்ளது: சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
Insurance Company Liable To Pay Compensation Even If Driver Was Intoxicated At Time Of Accident: Madras High Court The Madras High Court ha...

-
Preamble - THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 - 2024 CHAPTER I - PRELIMINARY Section 1 - Short title, commencement and application. Section 2...
-
# பாராளுமன்றத்தில் அதன் உறுப்பினர்கள் தங்கள் வாதங்களை எந்தெந்த மொழிகளில் தெரிவிக்கலாம் A ஆங்கிலம் மட்டும் B இந்தி மட்டு...
-
(i) Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offences. (ii) Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences. (iii) Summons Cases and Warrant Cases. https:...
-
CHAPTER 3 - GENERAL EXCEPTIONS - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - 2024 (BNS) Section 14 - Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact...
-
(BNS Act) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, in English, Tamil, Hindi Section 74. Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to outr...
-
CHAPTER 4 - OF ABETMENT, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND ATTEMPT - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) Section 45 - Abetment of a thing. Section 4...
-
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 Section 169 - No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence Follow our : https://...
-
*BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023-2024* *CHAPTER 30 - SUBMISSION OF DEATH SENTENCES FOR CONFIRMATION* Section 407 - Sentence o...
-
(BNS Act) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, in English, Tamil, Hindi Section 80. Dowry death (1) Where the death of a woman is caused by any b...
-
வருகிற 19/08/2023 ம் தேதி 243 சிவில் ஜட்ஜ் பதவிக்கான அறிவிப்பு வெளியாக உள்ளது. அடுத்து மாவட்ட நீதிபதி தேர்வு அறிவிப்பு வெளியாக உள்ளது...
-
▼
2025
(9)
- ► February 2025 (6)
- ► January 2025 (2)
-
►
2024
(241)
- ► December 2024 (7)
- ► October 2024 (4)
- ► September 2024 (7)
- ► August 2024 (28)
- ► April 2024 (7)
- ► March 2024 (11)
- ► February 2024 (4)
- ► January 2024 (12)
-
►
2023
(491)
- ► December 2023 (24)
- ► November 2023 (2)
- ► October 2023 (1)
- ► September 2023 (50)
- ► August 2023 (101)
- ► April 2023 (24)
- ► March 2023 (36)
- ► February 2023 (28)
- ► January 2023 (175)
-
►
2022
(535)
- ► December 2022 (137)
- ► November 2022 (52)
- ► October 2022 (160)
- ► September 2022 (127)
- ► August 2022 (32)